I see nothing wrong with LEO using the best equipment available to protect themselves and the public. If they look military so be it. If my azz was out there on the line every day you can bet I'd want same or better equipment than the bad guys have. My guess is you would too. And I still don't buy it's the norm. You can cite exceptions until the cows come home that doesn't make it so. Maybe that's true where you are but it's not where I am.
By the way, you can now post your links. You have more than 10 posts. The 10 post minimum is to help keep down spam.
LLT - "Simply having a p. cooker" didn't get him arrested. My guess is the domestic assault, battery, making a false bomb threat and the 4 hour standoff probably had a bit more to do with it than the p. cooker.



Reply With Quote

) and as noted in the 2002 DEA Memo it doesn't "violate the Fourth Amendment if the officers' have actual knowledge that the circumstances that justified the no-knock authorization no longer exist at the time the warrant is executed. ". Who cares if an ounce of pot get's flushed? The use of two extremes (drugs and kidnappings) as an example to justify their use I find interesting when you know that kidnappings requiring no knock entries are fairly rare in enforcement (see the FBI's current crime statistics). Don't even get me started on the abuse of "asset forfeiture"................

Bookmarks