Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: High Sierra Foxhound 50 (External Frame Pack)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default High Sierra Foxhound 50 (External Frame Pack)

    Hey everyone,

    Just was wondering if anyone has heard, seen or found any reviews on the High Sierra Foxhound 50 pack? I've checked on a lot of search engines, but haven't found anything of substance.

    Long story short, I plan putting some quality investments towards my travel/hiking aspirations and thought that this seemed like a pretty good deal for the price -- problem is, doesn't seem to be any reviews out there. Having the right pack to me is essential and since I don't have time to get to a good outfitting store in my area, ordering online is going to have to be my way of getting something done.

    Any links would be greatly appreciated. If ya'll could help out that'd be awesome. Trying to get the most bang for my buck since their aren't a lot of greenbacks in my wallet these days.

    Thanks a lot in advance.
    Last edited by Warheit; 01-14-2012 at 05:13 AM.


  2. #2

    Default

    I have seen them on Amazon but without customer reviews. I have a decent ext. frame pack in the Jansport Carson. It has a few less compartments but is an original model that has been nicely upgraded and improved over the years.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Very interesting -- thanks for showing me that, Pete. Less weight and much more space compared to the High Sierra. The reviews seem pretty positive on it. Could you tell me about the personal experiences you've had? Pros and cons? What you could all pack, how much it weighed?

    I've also been scouting out the Bobcat 65 by High Sierra, and was able to come across this field report on it. I'm just doing a complete gear overhaul and want to make sure I have something reliable and big enough to hold what I'm looking for. I will post an inventory list in PDF format as soon as possible.

  4. #4

    Default

    It's got a torso length adjustment and the straps and belt are decent for comfort.
    You can haul 3-5 days of standard gear and a lot more depending on your weight-bearing philosophy (ultra-light etc).
    I loaded this gear and weighed in at about 25 lbs.
    Guests can not see images in the messages. Please register in the forum.
    Never had to haul long distance because it rides mainly in the canoe.
    Last edited by pete lynch; 01-14-2012 at 07:11 PM.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Thanks for sharing. How's the material on yours? Water resistant? Will be getting a rain cover for the next pack I get regardless.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warheit View Post
    Thanks for sharing. How's the material on yours? Water resistant? Will be getting a rain cover for the next pack I get regardless.
    Water resistant, yes. But I have a waterproof pack cover for it.
    I have a large alice also, with the molle strap/belt mods. That is for my BOB though.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Sarge,

    You know, that thought revolved around in my head for hours over the past few weeks when researching packs: Why did the High Sierra's go down so much in price?

    Quality? New models coming out? I don't know. FWIW, I found three field test reviews on the High Sierra Bobcat 65 pack and they all were positive.

    If I ever have a weekend off in the near future, I'm going to head to REI and try out a variety of packs before I actually make a decision. I'm just getting excited for the Spring - Fall because I'm going to have the most fun I ever have in my life guaranteed! Thanks again, ya'll.

  8. #8
    Not a Mod finallyME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,225

    Default

    If I was shopping for an external, I would get the Kelty Trekker 65. It is known for quality, and it is 2 lbs lighter than the High Sierra. And, surprisingly, it is cheaper than the High Sierra. By the way, I am not saying that the High Sierra is a bad pack.
    I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/FinallyMe78?feature=mhee

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    I know it sounds lame, but a pack has to have some sort of aesthetic appearance that is pleasing to me. The Kelly Trekker makes me want to vomit.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chugach National Forest
    Posts
    9,793
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warheit View Post
    I know it sounds lame, but a pack has to have some sort of aesthetic appearance that is pleasing to me. The Kelly Trekker makes me want to vomit.
    WHAT are you going to have SEX with your pretty pack......??? I own 28+ packs, My Kelty "Tioga" has packed many loads over 200# and has been in steady professional use for near 42 years. If I was to buy a new pack, I would buy the best pack I could afford. Hard to say which is more critical good boots or good pack.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Winter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    SE Alaska
    Posts
    3,166

    Default

    Personally, I can't own brightly colored gear. I'm worried someone will shoot me for ruining their view.
    I had a compass, but without a map, it's just a cool toy to show you where oceans and ice are.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sourdough View Post
    WHAT are you going to have SEX with your pretty pack......??? I own 28+ packs, My Kelty "Tioga" has packed many loads over 200# and has been in steady professional use for near 42 years. If I was to buy a new pack, I would buy the best pack I could afford. Hard to say which is more critical good boots or good pack.
    No. I'm a firm believer in aesthetics relationship to happiness and state of mind. Of course, prioritize quality over it in such an instance, but I'm not interested in buying a pack that looks like dog poo.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Chugach National Forest
    Posts
    9,793
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warheit View Post
    No. I'm a firm believer in aesthetics relationship to happiness and state of mind. Of course, prioritize quality over it in such an instance, but I'm not interested in buying a pack that looks like dog poo.

    If it works for you, go for it.

  14. #14
    Super-duper Moderator Sarge47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The People's Republic of Illinois
    Posts
    9,444
    Blog Entries
    32

    Cool Hey good buddy...!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sourdough View Post
    If it works for you, go for it.
    Sourdough, the important thing to remember is that Warheit came on here asking about info on a pack that he'd already pretty much decided on. Personally I think it's a POS and will not hold up to the rigors of the Rockies and yes, I lived in Colorado for 8 years, sorry I left. That being said, Warheit is perfectly correct in his opinion of what he wants in a backpack. If it goes bad on a hike then I hope that he'll be kind enough to inform the rest of us so that in the future we would have some info about the pack for future reference. I may be wrong on my viewpoint but it wouldn't be the 1st time. It will be interesting to see what transpires.


    pssst, Sourdough: I still like the Kelty, and I don't think it looks like dog poo. However different strokes for different folks. I wonder if the Sierra Foxhound 50 comes with a shiny new survival kit?
    Last edited by Sarge47; 01-29-2012 at 11:52 AM.
    SARGE
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
    Albert Einstein

    Proud father of a US Marine....SEMPER FI!

    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    Benjamin Franklin

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    It isn't a pack I've decided on, I saw the price, read some reviews on the bigger 65 pack (didn't see any on the 50) -- and was just curious if anyone was familiar with the brand or the quality. Just going forth with due diligence. I don't plan on getting most of my stuff until the Spring comes. Don't have much time to do backpacking putting in 110 hours every two weeks. Will be heading to REI to try out various external and internal framed packs in February (time permitting) to get a feel for them first hand. I'm always weary of buying things before getting a fit or try out, but I'm pretty remote right now and am not sure if there are any quality local dealers. Not that I know of at least. You know how it goes.
    Last edited by Warheit; 01-29-2012 at 02:22 PM.

  16. #16
    Not a Mod finallyME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,225

    Default

    I think looks matter, to an extent. And I don't think that the High Sierra packs are crap. Just that Kelty packs are better. If you buy the High Sierra, it probably won't crap out on you. You will have just spent more money on a pack that is a little heavier. Anyways, Kelty also makes the Yukon series. It is a little different color. My local farm store sells these. They advertise as a kids pack, but they seem much bigger than that, and able to hold a lot of weight. It is the same weight as the Trekker, but costs a little less. It looks like it has the same suspension.


    Guests can not see images in the messages. Please register in the forum.
    Guests can not see images in the messages. Please register in the forum.

    Anyways, I am not trying to sell you on a Kelty. Just shop around until you find one that fits.
    I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/FinallyMe78?feature=mhee

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Dakota
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Thanks, finallyME. I appreciate the advice.

  18. #18
    Super-duper Moderator Sarge47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The People's Republic of Illinois
    Posts
    9,444
    Blog Entries
    32

    Cool Suh-wheat!

    Finallyme, do you have a model name for that backpack? Kelty Rocks!
    SARGE
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
    Albert Einstein

    Proud father of a US Marine....SEMPER FI!

    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    Benjamin Franklin

  19. #19
    Not a Mod finallyME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarge47 View Post
    Finallyme, do you have a model name for that backpack? Kelty Rocks!
    Kelty Yukon. I got those pictures from Campmor. They sell the Trekker and the Yukon, so you can compare them if you want.
    I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/FinallyMe78?feature=mhee

  20. #20

    Default

    On the pictures I've seen, the High Sierra pack does not appear to have load-lifter/stabilizer straps, which the Kelty does.

    For me, that fact alone would skew the decision away from the High Sierra.

    That, and I've had lots of good luck with Kelty gear over the years.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •