Unh huh...
Compliments to Mrs. Rick...well done, madam, well done!!!
Yes he was wrong
No
Undecided
Unh huh...
Compliments to Mrs. Rick...well done, madam, well done!!!
Interesting point. I have killed many an animal on the farm, and I do respect and thank them for giving their lives for my sustenance. Maybe it is because I don't kill bears for food (although I eat the ones that I have killed). Mainly kill them when they are repeatedly killing livestock close to the house. Other than that, on the norm I leave them alone.
Have Lights? Thank a Lineman!
"Being prepared is sometimes inconvenient, but not being prepared is always inconvenient." - Fred Choate
Last edited by klkak; 12-24-2010 at 04:41 AM.
1. If it's in your kit and you don't know how to use it....It's useless.
2. If you can't reach your kit when you need it....Its useless.
Alaska Backcountry Adventure Tours
www.youralaskavacation.com
Tell them Kevin sent you!!
With all do respect, Presenting ideas and facts about any position while trying to remain neutral is not the same as dancing around a persons beliefs. You've done it plenty of times in the gun threads.. I'm not even sure who you are refering to with this issue, most on both sides have been quite clear where they stand. Mike (the OP) might be the exception but he was clear that he wanted to know what we thought.
I've never been a good dancer...I do like to give my reasons for why I believe what I do and most posters on one side of this has been giving their reasons and facts about hunting and why it is ethical and the other side is talking about 700 pound penis'.
Just in case your not clear with my beliefs...This guy did nothing wrong and in fact, probably did more good for the younger bears, the fawns that will be born (and not eaten by this giant) in the spring and even the stores in that area that rely on hunters and hunting. If you've ever camped,hiked or had a picnic at a state park or any state owned public land, you've probably benefited from hunters $$....your welcome!
In all honesty, I am quite surprised by the poll results, Just sayin![]()
Actually, I am too.
I thought I'd be in the minority and it certainly felt that way.
a little more ,
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
GRAND JUNCTION — Colorado wildlife managers say they’re discussing whether to change hunting rules after a man reported shooting and killing a large black bear in its den.
Division of Wildlife spokesman Randy Hampton tells the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel the hunter didn’t break any rules. Hampton says the incident does raise “ethical issues.”
The hunter, Richard Kendall of Craig, defends his decision. He says he waited outside the northwest Colorado den for five hours, hoping the bear would emerge, before crawling about 6 feet into it and seeing the bear.
The Sentinel reports the bear weighed 703 pounds, about 50 percent more than most black bears.
The newspaper says preliminary measurements indicate the bear could set a state size record.
***
Kendall told the Craig Daily Press, “You can’t even believe how much I respect that bear."
But some apparently feel otherwise, because, at least on newspaper forums, he's been getting a lot of flak for shooting the bear in its den.
http://www.outtherecolorado.com/blog...n-its-den.html
Not sure how to answer,In Northren WI we use bait stations and dogs those are the means of hunting bear here.Seems like tracking a bear to its den is all right to me.I don't think it any more ethical to build a fire and "smoke a bear out" and put a bullet in it only 10 feet from where it was sleeping.
yeah, I thought, that don't shoot ducks on a pond comment was funny as well...I've shot alot of ducks on ponds...the elk i killed this year was a nice fat cow...it seems the more connected to your food you are- the less "ethical" you are! Its much more ethical to export your exploitation of animals and let someone else kill your food and wrap it up in sell it to you then it is to get your hands dirty...
The way of the canoe is the way of the wilderness and of a freedom almost forgotten- Sigurd Olson
Give me winter, give me dogs... you can keep the rest- Knud Rasmussen
Says who?
People who object to shooting bears in their dens also object to unethical treatment of all animals even the ones solely intended for consumption. The others pipe in only when their food gets contaminated with feces and mouse droppings. Or when roach legs get discovered in their SPAM.
I don't know, B. My neighbor has a dog I'd like to shoot while it's sleeping or even while it's barking its danged fool head off at 11:00 at night. And I wouldn't eat it, just let it lay for the neighbor to deal with. I wouldn't consider it ethical, just profoundly satisfying.
Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.
Maybe you should off the idiot neighbor who allows it to happen.
It's like blaming kids for irresponsible parenting.
Naaaaa. That would be to ethical.
Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.
Didn't y'all just got through tellin' me how that don't matter...and I was startin' to believe you?
Have you voiced your concerns with the dogs owner ? Maybe they need a punch in the nose to remind them to put the dog inside at night,,, Ya know, I never could understand why dogs that bark like that do not drive the owners crazy as well ??
It's official 65.22% of the people responding to this poll have put me into a quandary. If I was to say how I feel about these people, I will be kicked off this forum for good. If I sit back and say nothing then I look like a nut for cussing at my computer.
I guess I probably said enough.
Merry Christmas.
Remember, it's just an opinion.
Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.
Bookmarks