View Poll Results: Was the guy wrong to kill the bear in the den?

Voters
50. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes he was wrong

    29 58.00%
  • No

    16 32.00%
  • Undecided

    5 10.00%
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 187

Thread: Hunter shoots bear in its Den!

  1. #101
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Unh huh...
    Compliments to Mrs. Rick...well done, madam, well done!!!


  2. #102
    Senior Member aflineman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pocomoonskyeyes3 View Post
    Hmmm... kind of like the chickens, cows, and pigs, etc that we eat every day.... Interesting analogy. You see the BEST of those species are where the "Breeding stock" comes from. Good point.... except when they have reached the end of their usefulness, they too are sent to slaughter.

    I just find it extremely odd that such different perceptions can be applied to domestic and wild animals. It's OK for one, but not the other.

    It is to me at least as clear of an example of double standards as can be exhibited. This is OK/Good for this_____ but not this_____.
    Oh BTW My vote is the only one in the undecided category. I can see valid points on both sides, yet have been arguing in favor of the guy almost all along. I wouldn't do what he did for my own various reasons, of which there are several, yet see nothing actually wrong with what was done. All laws were in fact followed.

    I just thought I would reveal where my vote actually fell, as I am done with this argument/Debate. I cannot fathom how it is OK for that and worse to be done to "Domesticated" animals. Yet for a wild animal it is an entirely different set of standards. The Hypocrisy is astounding. Domestic Chickens are grabbed in the wee hours of the morning when they are shipped to the slaughterhouse, while they are on the roost. The chicken house is lit with nothing but red lights during this process so as to NOT disturb the sleeping chickens. Chickens cannot defend themselves near as well as that bear either. Yet it is OK for one but not the other. Pick any meat you eat and the story is pretty much as bad as that.... just different circumstances. It really makes me wonder how many have ever seen the total process of the life cycle of the animals we eat every day. Or ever been on a farm where people raise the animals they slaughter to put on their own table. I've seen it done, I've seen members of my family go out and get the best chicken in the coop because company was coming. The neck wrung, the carcass dressed out and cooked.

    If you've ever watched "Ole Yeller" you have seen the free range hogs... that were for all intents and purposes "Wild" or Feral. There is not one bit of difference between that and hunting today.... except that there are more laws involved, "Rules, standards, and Ethics". Meat is meat. If you eat it it is not so pretty and ethical in any sense of the word. You go out, find the desired animal, kill it, clean it, and eat it. Fishermen do the same thing with "Trophy" catches..... but they are only fish after all.

    American Indians respected ALL life. Everything that grew and lived sacrificed it's life so that we could live. Plants, animals, fish all were equally appreciated.... They ALL died so we could live. Just my opinion, but the further removed we become from the Earth, the more artificial our attitude towards all living things become..... Oh it's just a tomato, soybean, rabbit, chicken, deer, bear.... Yet they all live and died so that we can live. The Great beasts were honored with stories of their existence.... Trophy Hunters are able to do this too with the animals PRESENCE as well. In a sense these animals are immortalized. Yet no one sees this aspect.

    Someone will eat that meat. It might be a Nursing Home, a homeless shelter, school, or hospital, or the hunter, his friends and family.... but someone will eat it I am fairly certain. The ONLY thing used to determine the "Trophy status" of a bear is the dried skull, and it's (the Bears) measurements. They have the weight, so no need to save the meat to waste it, it can be harvested and used. Someone please tell me that I am not the only one to see the double standard here between "Domestic" and "Wild" animals. This is why I have argued so long in defense of that hunter. OK to grab a sleeping chicken to slaughter, but heaven forbid the same is done with a bear that was NOT asleep.
    Interesting point. I have killed many an animal on the farm, and I do respect and thank them for giving their lives for my sustenance. Maybe it is because I don't kill bears for food (although I eat the ones that I have killed). Mainly kill them when they are repeatedly killing livestock close to the house. Other than that, on the norm I leave them alone.
    Have Lights? Thank a Lineman!
    "Being prepared is sometimes inconvenient, but not being prepared is always inconvenient." - Fred Choate

  3. #103
    Coming through klkak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    3,012
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mtnman Mike View Post
    "There are certainly ethical standards within the hunting community: Don't shoot ducks on a pond. Don't shoot turkeys on a roost. Don't shoot bears in a den.
    Dang all this time I thought I was an ethical hunter!

    I hunt for meat and I kill it where I find it.

    BTW, the deer I shot the other day was a doe.
    Last edited by klkak; 12-24-2010 at 04:41 AM.
    1. If it's in your kit and you don't know how to use it....It's useless.
    2. If you can't reach your kit when you need it....Its useless.

    Alaska Backcountry Adventure Tours
    www.youralaskavacation.com
    Tell them Kevin sent you!!

  4. #104
    Senior Member randyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    tip of the mitt
    Posts
    5,255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    Would you look at that?! I said soap box. I meant pedestal. a thousand pardons.

    Freudian slip ??? perhaps LoL

  5. #105
    Senior Member Camp10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Western PA
    Posts
    2,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BENESSE View Post
    Ever since I slipped off of my soap box and landed on my a$$, I learned to just stay put and work from there. That's where I be posting from.
    Now, any time people feel challenged in their belief, instead of facing it head on, some (you know who you are, and so do I) like to dance around and deflect. Answer questions that weren't asked, and say things just to hear themselves talk. Well, fine...whatever floats your boat is OK with me. But let's not kid ourselves. Just cause I cant see you doesn't mean I'm not on to you.
    Yeah, you too 2D, and you know it! (who loves you baby?)

    With all do respect, Presenting ideas and facts about any position while trying to remain neutral is not the same as dancing around a persons beliefs. You've done it plenty of times in the gun threads.. I'm not even sure who you are refering to with this issue, most on both sides have been quite clear where they stand. Mike (the OP) might be the exception but he was clear that he wanted to know what we thought.

    I've never been a good dancer...I do like to give my reasons for why I believe what I do and most posters on one side of this has been giving their reasons and facts about hunting and why it is ethical and the other side is talking about 700 pound penis'.

    Just in case your not clear with my beliefs...This guy did nothing wrong and in fact, probably did more good for the younger bears, the fawns that will be born (and not eaten by this giant) in the spring and even the stores in that area that rely on hunters and hunting. If you've ever camped,hiked or had a picnic at a state park or any state owned public land, you've probably benefited from hunters $$....your welcome!

  6. #106
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Camp10 View Post
    If you've ever camped,hiked or had a picnic at a state park or any state owned public land, you've probably benefited from hunters $$....your welcome!
    Yes I did, just this past summer. Yellowstone & Custer.
    And I paid too, just to get in. You gotta pay to play. Don't mind at all, worth every penny.

  7. #107
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern California, High desert
    Posts
    7,435

    Default

    In all honesty, I am quite surprised by the poll results, Just sayin

  8. #108
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Actually, I am too.
    I thought I'd be in the minority and it certainly felt that way.

  9. #109
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern California, High desert
    Posts
    7,435

    Default

    a little more ,

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    GRAND JUNCTION — Colorado wildlife managers say they’re discussing whether to change hunting rules after a man reported shooting and killing a large black bear in its den.


    Division of Wildlife spokesman Randy Hampton tells the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel the hunter didn’t break any rules. Hampton says the incident does raise “ethical issues.”

    The hunter, Richard Kendall of Craig, defends his decision. He says he waited outside the northwest Colorado den for five hours, hoping the bear would emerge, before crawling about 6 feet into it and seeing the bear.

    The Sentinel reports the bear weighed 703 pounds, about 50 percent more than most black bears.

    The newspaper says preliminary measurements indicate the bear could set a state size record.

    ***

    Kendall told the Craig Daily Press, “You can’t even believe how much I respect that bear."

    But some apparently feel otherwise, because, at least on newspaper forums, he's been getting a lot of flak for shooting the bear in its den.


    http://www.outtherecolorado.com/blog...n-its-den.html

  10. #110
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern California, High desert
    Posts
    7,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BENESSE View Post
    Actually, I am too.
    I thought I'd be in the minority and it certainly felt that way.
    Nope, Firmly in the Majority

  11. #111
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Northren WI
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Not sure how to answer,In Northren WI we use bait stations and dogs those are the means of hunting bear here.Seems like tracking a bear to its den is all right to me.I don't think it any more ethical to build a fire and "smoke a bear out" and put a bullet in it only 10 feet from where it was sleeping.

  12. #112
    Neo-Numptie DOGMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    cyber space
    Posts
    2,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klkak View Post
    Dang all this time I thought I was an ethical hunter!

    I hunt for meat and I kill it where I find it.

    BTW, the deer I shot the other day was a doe.
    yeah, I thought, that don't shoot ducks on a pond comment was funny as well...I've shot alot of ducks on ponds...the elk i killed this year was a nice fat cow...it seems the more connected to your food you are- the less "ethical" you are! Its much more ethical to export your exploitation of animals and let someone else kill your food and wrap it up in sell it to you then it is to get your hands dirty...
    The way of the canoe is the way of the wilderness and of a freedom almost forgotten- Sigurd Olson

    Give me winter, give me dogs... you can keep the rest- Knud Rasmussen

  13. #113
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DOGMAN View Post
    yeah, I thought, that don't shoot ducks on a pond comment was funny as well...I've shot alot of ducks on ponds...the elk i killed this year was a nice fat cow...it seems the more connected to your food you are- the less "ethical" you are! Its much more ethical to export your exploitation of animals and let someone else kill your food and wrap it up in sell it to you then it is to get your hands dirty...
    Says who?
    People who object to shooting bears in their dens also object to unethical treatment of all animals even the ones solely intended for consumption. The others pipe in only when their food gets contaminated with feces and mouse droppings. Or when roach legs get discovered in their SPAM.

  14. #114
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,806

    Default

    I don't know, B. My neighbor has a dog I'd like to shoot while it's sleeping or even while it's barking its danged fool head off at 11:00 at night. And I wouldn't eat it, just let it lay for the neighbor to deal with. I wouldn't consider it ethical, just profoundly satisfying.
    Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.

  15. #115
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Maybe you should off the idiot neighbor who allows it to happen.
    It's like blaming kids for irresponsible parenting.

  16. #116
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,806

    Default

    Naaaaa. That would be to ethical.
    Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.

  17. #117
    Senior Member BENESSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    9,677

    Default

    Didn't y'all just got through tellin' me how that don't matter...and I was startin' to believe you?

  18. #118
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Southern California, High desert
    Posts
    7,435

    Default

    Have you voiced your concerns with the dogs owner ? Maybe they need a punch in the nose to remind them to put the dog inside at night,,, Ya know, I never could understand why dogs that bark like that do not drive the owners crazy as well ??

  19. #119

    Default

    It's official 65.22% of the people responding to this poll have put me into a quandary. If I was to say how I feel about these people, I will be kicked off this forum for good. If I sit back and say nothing then I look like a nut for cussing at my computer.

    I guess I probably said enough.

    Merry Christmas.

  20. #120
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,806

    Default

    Remember, it's just an opinion.
    Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •