2dumb, some decades back, most state legislatures were "part time" in nature. A great percentage of legislators were lawyers then. And the laws that were passed usually made sense.
Today, most, if not all, state legislatures are in session practically year-round. Most legislators today are not lawyers. They are "career" politicians who vote in a knee-jerk reaction to every shift in public sentiment that passes by.
For example, isn't "assault and battery" just that? Why do we need to pass countless other similar laws? Assault and battery of a police officer; assault and battery of a firefighter; assault and battery of a person over age 65; assault and battery of a publc servant; assault and battery of a mentally retarded person; assault and battery of a child under 14; assault and battery of a "protected class" of individual.......... Get my point? Assault and battery is the same crime no matter who the victim is. However, our legislators feel a need to pander to public opinion and the press, so we just keep seeing new laws being passed.
Most of the laws - criminal and otherwise - passed over the last few decades are a travesty. We incarcerate more of our citizens (in real numbers) than any other nation in the world and we have the highest percentage of our citizens in prison than does any other nation in the world. And the public response to everything is "lock-em-up and throw away the key." Why?
We tolerate "drunk-driving" roadblocks as a quick-fix to stop drunk drivers and we accept (often non-existent) "confidential informants" as a basis for issuing search warrants. We tolerate routine beatings of criminal suspects by law enforcement officials (yes, a small minority of them) and actually applaud such conduct.
Our prosecutors are more concerned with winning convictions than with doing justice. How is justice served when police and prosecutors withhold evidence and achieve a conviction of an innocent party? Have you ever really gotten angry when you've read one of the countless news stories about a man being freed because he was found innocent of a crime he served decades of his life in jail for after being wrongfully convicted?
Do you believe that a police officer who punches a handcuffed suspect in the face and breaks his nose should go to prison?
Do you understand that there is really a good reason for the so called presumption of innocence?
Do you understand that lawyers are the thin line that separates the people from a government going haywire?




Reply With Quote
"That world" was still in play when I was a little girl. Too much has happened, and we aren't as safe as we once were. Hold on to your freedoms by all means...but adjust to the way the world is today. Todays world SUCKS and her people are mean.

Bookmarks