Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: DOG vs. SUV

  1. #1
    Senior Member 2dumb2kwit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northeastern NC
    Posts
    8,530

    Default DOG vs. SUV

    Robert and Brenda Vale, two sustainable-living researchers from New Zealand, authored the study, which was reviewed in the New Scientist. Their conclusions are based on the amount of resources expended to feed household pets - in a medium-sized dog's case it takes slightly more than 2 acres of land to produce the roughly 360 pounds of meat and 210 pounds of grain they consume each year.

    In contrast, less than half that amount of land would be required to produce the energy to power an SUV driven a modest 10,000 miles a year, according to the study.
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...killing-planet
    Writer of wrongs.
    Honey, just cuz I talk slow doesn't mean I'm stupid. (Jake- Sweet Home Alabama)
    "Stop Global Whining"


  2. #2
    Not a Mod finallyME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,225

    Default

    They don't show what meat source they are using. I wouldn't be surprised if the numbers changed in favor of dogs, if they used rabbits as the meat source.
    I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/FinallyMe78?feature=mhee

  3. #3
    Neo-Numptie DOGMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    cyber space
    Posts
    2,026

    Default

    Most commerical dog food sold is composed mainly of corn and chicken by-products. To my knowledge none of its grown specifically for dogs...dogs get the waste products associated with human food production.

    There are smaller dog food companies that use higher quality ingredients, but in general it is still not food that was for human consumption. The niche market of "super premium" quality dog food out there, still is not truly fit for humans.

    I have worked closely with two different dog food companies developing high powered formulas, and they are always discussing the bottom line...and the bottom line is dogs get our scraps. So, I don't really agree with the little I have heard about this study.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ClayPick's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia
    Posts
    706

    Default

    There goes my carbon footprint, shot to hell.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Winnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Middle England
    Posts
    5,780
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I suppose if you're going to assume that the dog gets the whole (farmed) animal, then I think it would be about right. But as Jason pointed out most commercial dog food uses the bits folk won't eat or is unfit for human consumption, so the math is way off.

    Back in the day when I had my dogs, the Greyhound and Whippet caught their own dinner most of the time and when they didn't I'd buy them offal (mainly heart and lights) and feed it raw. Never trusted ready made dog food. Treats came in the form of homemade bread toasted and spread with a bit of Marmite (the Greyhound would do anything for Marmite on toast!)
    Recession; A period when you go without something your Grandparents never heard of.

  6. #6
    reclinite automaton canid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Central California/West Texas
    Posts
    6,622

    Default

    they aren't talking about the meat in the food, but the grain.
    Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To see what's going on in my knife shop check out CanidArmory on Youtube or on Facebook.

  7. #7
    Neo-Numptie DOGMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    cyber space
    Posts
    2,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by canid View Post
    they aren't talking about the meat in the food, but the grain.
    Then why does the original post mention the 360 pounds of meat?
    Also, even the corn and grains that go into pet food arent first quality....

  8. #8
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,806

    Default

    Not being a farmer, I don't know. Can you actually raise 360 pounds of meat and 210 pounds of grain on 2 acres of land? I would think the meat would be doable but 210 pounds of grain is a lot of grain. Depends on moisture content I guess.
    Tracks Across the High Plains...Death on the Bombay Line...A Touch of Death and Mayhem...Dead Rock...The Griswald Mine Boys...All On Amazon Books.

  9. #9

  10. #10

  11. #11

  12. #12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •