It's funny how you get all these old guys beating their chest about what "we" should do when in fact it's the yunguns who are always being sent out to do the job.
When y'all volunteer to get it done, I'll start paying attention.:sneaky2:
Printable View
It's funny how you get all these old guys beating their chest about what "we" should do when in fact it's the yunguns who are always being sent out to do the job.
When y'all volunteer to get it done, I'll start paying attention.:sneaky2:
That's nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick
Mom's should be in charge of wars. No young men would be sent and husbands would finish all the "honey do" jobs for fear of being sent. It would be a win/win.
We can if they would untie our hands. Noooo. We have to play by their rules. It's got to be fair. While we're at it lets transfer some wealth too.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
If they did it the way us old guys wanted it done, the young uns would only have to push some buttonsQuote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
We tied our own hands Reb. Nobody to blame but ourselves.
Securing our borders will eliminate the inflow of preferred future voters.Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel
Winning the war on drugs is a fantasy and contrary to the financial interests of many in law enforcement, prison management, and a host of other bureauctacies.
Oh wait yeah , we cant just send in a nice volley of missiles, oh no that would put an end to the BS and THE US didn't lose any lives in the process how wrong that would be
There you go again...Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
do it your danged self and leave the kids out of it. :winkiss:
Ah, yes. We agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
We tried helping with that DEA sent the cartel a bunch of guns remember !!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
ABSOLUTELY WE AGREE!!! and why the hell do we have to wait to be attacked first.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
Yea, I know. Just showing the hypocrisy. The never ending BS that we have to listen to.
Dammit. I am so craving a bowl of kimchi and a plate of bulgogi.
Point me to the controls, I have no problem pushing the button. Hell Im the guy that asked to push the button on a few executions when I worked for TDC, but thats against policy .Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
Im craving, fried bologna and cheese, and a root beer floatQuote:
Originally Posted by Ken
Just send Joe the VP.
You guys can huff and puff all you want, but the reality is that we are not the the country we once were nor are we gonna be allowed (without consequences) to unilaterally and preemptively do what we feel like doing; same way we wouldn't tolerate the same (and didn't in the past) when other countries did it.
Why is that so hard to comprehend?
Why not go to NK on suicide mission and take the midget out?Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
Had a fried bologna and cheese a few days ago. No root beer floats. I'm on a diet. Unless I drive by an A&W.Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
We've known that for a long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
It would also open doors for other countries to do the same. Against possibles (Israel, Taiwan, ...).
Danged if you do or don't and they know it.
We CAN do it and we CAN get away with it, and I can think of two countries that are begging us to do it. I say that we should be a kinder and gentler nation and give N.K. and Iran EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR, and not give them the chance to ram a few up our azz, because that's exactly what they will do, directly or through a proxy, once they have the capability of doing so.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
well lets see, we knew all about Sadam, and Bin lauden well before 9/11 , guess if we werent such a civilized nation we wouldnt of sacrificed all them lives before we did something about it .
Chertoff on that:" it's not a matter of IF but WHEN".Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
+1 Rebel!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel
Watch Un fire a gun, LOL.
http://landing.newsinc.com/bostonher...d&VID=24719068
Well if we end up taking out North Korea, I wonder how much of the tax payers money we will spend rebuilding those azz holes country for them:angry:
I don't know, maybe 35¢. There isn't much there now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildthang
OK, I'll play along.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
The former Soviet Union had those capabilities, but the assured mutual destruction kept them in line.
How does that concept not work now?
...furthermore, I seem to remember something about "an armed society is a polite society" argument of everyone being armed to their teeth. Well, this is the same thing on a global scale.
Ok question, Seeing that China is a close allies of NK, and dont the US supply a large portion of food to China ? Why cant the US say hey China do something about NK NOW or no more food!!
Because China can then turn around and say, Ok, pay up now! and we'll have us a Mexican standoff. Or would that be a Chinese standoff?Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
Yeah thats true, forgot they own our buttsQuote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
The Soviets were not completely insane, as Un appears to be, nor were they religious fanatics like the Iranian regime. One thing I don't recall is the Soviets threatening to incinerate the United States (or Israel) like these crazies are doing now. The Soviets talked tough, but they weren't threatening us with evaporation BEFORE they had the capacity to do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
Do you also remember something about crazy people engaging in mass killings, and how it may have gone differently if just one good guy with a gun had been there?Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
WE are the good guys with an even bigger gun. Let's see if y'all's theory works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
In all seriousness, I do not think NK has anything that can reach the US, and if he did , we have the capability of shooting it our of the sky before it does any damage. My question is, IF the crazy little bass turd does act on his threats are we going to just brush it off as no harm no foul, or are we going to run a couple hundred scuds ( or what ever is the missle of choice) up his porky pig looking ARSE!!!!!
Okay, say you walk into an armed robbery in a convenience store. The perp points his revolver at you as you take cover, rapid fires all six shots, and misses. By this time, you have your .45 pointed right at him. No harm, no foul? How 'bout if he drops his empties and pulls out a speed loader?Quote:
Originally Posted by welderguy
We ARE the good guys. We DO have bigger guns. I just don't have any confidence in the guy calling the shots.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE
It's his constitutional right to have it and you supported it vehemantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken
Now deal with it.
I STILL support his right to have it. That wasn't my point at all. I was responding to the "no harm - no foul" question. Let's just say that his speed loader would never make contact with his cylinder.Quote:
Originally Posted by BENESSE