On the subject at hand has anyone considered a .410.
I believe you guys can get semi auto versions. (Check out the Safirarms webpage).
They'd be lightweight and effective with a variety of loads to suit from single ball shot to #9 ratshot/snakeshot.
Printable View
On the subject at hand has anyone considered a .410.
I believe you guys can get semi auto versions. (Check out the Safirarms webpage).
They'd be lightweight and effective with a variety of loads to suit from single ball shot to #9 ratshot/snakeshot.
Some 410's are also cap. of firing the 45 long colt.
The reasons for my choice of a 22 magnum is simple. Inexpensive ammo, low noise, compared to my shotgun. I don't like to make my presence known if at all possible. and it's deadly effective for what I hunt. Groundhogs, squirrell, coon's, rabbit, turkey, etc... Now if I lived out west I would have something in addition to my 22 for use as protection against bears, and big cats.
I'm up for trading my scattergun for a 22 mag. any takers???
Count me solid in the .22 Magnum camp also, for a pure survival cartridge. The REMINGTON model 597 with 1X to 4X scope is one of my favorite winter (Big'Fuzzy Sleeps) walk'about firearms. I always wished they would make a rimfire .25 Mag. on the same length case.
Not very many cartridges that you can dump 50 rounds in each front pocket.
I agree with the 12 ga. but don't rule out the 45-70. When I lived in New England, Marlin had just intro'd the 1895 Guide Gun. Kittery Trading Post (BIG outdoors store, the Holy Land) had a six month back order due to all the guides in the area wanting one. That says a lot to me.
Nothing wrong with the .12 Ga. nothing wrong with the 45/70.......BUT, here is a interesting experiment. Either on paper or in your memory keep track of what you see in the outdoors. like 175 robins to 1 turkey. or 815 prairie dogs to 1 Elk. I have spent a whole week in some parts of Alaska in the fall and seen nothing bigger than spruce hens in the whole week. There is no perfect answer, I think the 256 Winchester, is near perfect. It is a .357 Magnum case necked down to .25 caliber. or the .22 Hornet, or .22 K-Hornet is better.
What if the survival situation lasted 5 months, or 5 years...? Most people only think in terms of 2 days or 4 days, what if it was forever, the rest of your life.....? I would want a lot of ammo.
Hope, I have a Ruger 77/22 hornet stainless/laminated that I had Wild West cut down to 22 inches and recrown. I put low power Burris glass on it. I use it to hunt winter Sitka in PWS as well as fur. I use Remington 45gr. hollow points and Hornady 35gr. V-max's with deadly effectiveness. But then everyone here should know I am a die hard fan of .22 caliber.
Years ago when there was a bounty on seals, there was a guy who would fill his pockets with .22 K-Hornets and wander all around Afognak Island shooting seals. He had many run'ins with Kodiak Brown Bears, He just used the .22 k-Hornet to solve the problem. Most likely more Polar Bear been harvested with the .222 Remington than everything else together.
There is nothing wrong with the .223. Well there is the fact that .223 ammo is getting harder to come by due to the war. Oh yea and you can carry more .22 hornet. If you are a good shot you won't need all those fast back up shot you get with the AR. Nope, there is nothing wrong with the .223, Nothing at all.
Just bought another 1000 rounds of 223 this past week end. No shortage at the gun show I attended, but it has gone up in price.
the only problem with 22 cals is that in some places its illegal for big game that's why i like 243.
Nothing the .223 Remington, is nothing more than the .222 Remington Magnum with the shoulder changed so the Government did not have to pay Remington a fee.
If one wants to be super critical of the .223 Rem. class of cartridges, it is the painful loud report. Making it hard to hunt game or scout the enemy with our ears wide open, and the next second, painful loud discharge, and made worse by the 10" 14" or 16" barrel length.
Think about, The shotgun is sub sonic the 22 Mag is not. You will here the 22 long ahead of the shotgun.
It is MY hearing I care about, I shoot all three most days. And the .223 Is the only one I must have hearing protection for. For all firearms hearing protection should be used. But if you are hunting you can't have hearing protection on. In a DLP situation I will discharge the .22 mag. or the shotguns, but it really hurts to discharge the 10" barrel AR-15 .223 Rem. or 6.8 SPC.
Hopeak I see your point, just saying that in bear country the 45-70 wouldn't be a bad idea.
Klkak, how do you like Wild West's work? Been thinking about having them do a 1895 guide gun for me.
A 20 gauge/.62 cal flintlock fusil, or a .32 cal flintlock rifle.