Originally Posted by
remy
Ridge;
How silly you are...as if on a forum, your responses were not free to spark interest from all participants...I know what you meant by that word, it is because i know what you meant by that word that i pointed to its silliness. Now if you meant something else by it, then why choose this word ?
Beerdude;
Same all same all yes ? You want answers, and i have none to give...like a little child, you pull on my pants while asking relentlessly for some point...some resolution put in a form which suits your intellectual laziness...answers and resolutions are not for me to give. Especially to those that cannot hear.
If i am best ignored, you yourself are best to ignore me.
Montana;
Your "shortcomings", as you simply put it, are not of technics. How did my 11 dogs interact ? Like dogs. My method ? A "not-doing" or what some refer to as "wu-wei". But i never said i intended on training those dogs for a particular task...i simply said, between the lines, that the whip does not fit a "positive reward" method. I simply pointed out a dichotomy within your post...a dichotomy reflected once again in all of us...me included.
Grundle;
You are a funny one.
I will pass on debating about the defensive mechanisms belonging to Montana, since you obviously have better things to look at.
Ok...let's take your little surge of misplaced hormones seriously for a second.
You bring up "bear whisper" to drive your point about wild and domesticated...are you for real ? As if a specific specie, under a specific "quantity" (your word...which by the way does not work...but ok) was linked to eating my face off. I have seen horses kill, and bears walk away...dogs kill, and sharks swim away. Your little temper-tantrum must be jamming your circuitry...Wild and domesticated are indeed two different "quantities", but in no way, one or the other determines the outcome of an encounter.
Next...i do not know where you fetched this "magical" term, but your imagination has no borders. You go on to talk about concepts that never even entered my mind, or maybe a little when i was 5 years old, like "oneness with the earth", or "secretly" communicating with animals, or "humming"...it is humorous and kind of cute, and might spark a little shiver in the eyes of wildwoman, but you are miles away from Intelligence...who would have thought...
Seriously, we are here talking about relations. Dare i say it...intelligent relations...between us men, or between us and dogs...us and anything...
If you, Grundle, can give me your understanding of this relation, or even you beerdude, then we might be getting somewhere...but if, you still feel like reverting to acting like a child in a wet paper bag vomiting his lunch, then i am not interested.
If we ask ourselves the meaning, the direction of the word "relation", we might give answers to Montana. Not through technics all more absurd and dysfunctional than the next, but in intents all more coherent than the next...all pointing towards intelligence.