Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: has the world gone daft?

  1. #1
    Senior Member randyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    tip of the mitt
    Posts
    5,258

    Default has the world gone daft?

    check out this link and the mounties caved in.

    http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/rcmp-sw...tive-1.2028529
    so the definition of a criminal is someone who breaks the law and you want me to believe that somehow more laws make less criminals?


  2. #2
    Senior Member hunter63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SE/SW Wisconsin
    Posts
    26,866

    Default

    That's is pretty sad......
    Geezer Squad....Charter Member #1
    Evoking the 50 year old rule...
    First 50 years...worried about the small stuff...second 50 years....Not so much
    Member Wahoo Killer knives club....#27

  3. #3
    Junior Member Tokwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Penang and Kulim Malaysia
    Posts
    1,479

    Default

    sad for the Mounties or the Muskrats?
    I'm a Gramp who is not computer savvy, give me a slab and the rock ages tablet..I will do fine!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    it's sad to a greater extent than just the mounties decision

  5. #5
    Senior Member 2dumb2kwit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northeastern NC
    Posts
    8,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tokwan View Post
    sad for the Mounties or the Muskrats?
    For the sheep, who will now be breed and kept in small nasty pens, so they can be sheered every so often for their wool, to make the new beenies.

    The sheep probably wish they could live free.......like muskrats.
    Writer of wrongs.
    Honey, just cuz I talk slow doesn't mean I'm stupid. (Jake- Sweet Home Alabama)
    "Stop Global Whining"

  6. #6
    Junior Member Tokwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Penang and Kulim Malaysia
    Posts
    1,479

    Default

    Hehehe..I think of it as going to the barber often,.,.who knows one day the sheep breeder will make tons of money and starts grooming his flock to look like thos poodles with the poodle haircut...hehehehehe
    I'm a Gramp who is not computer savvy, give me a slab and the rock ages tablet..I will do fine!

  7. #7
    Senior Member WolfVanZandt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    I have a polyester (well, plastic fiber of some kind) hat like that - it's pretty comfortable in the winter time.

    When I hear "caving in". I think of doing something that's wrong to satisfy others.

    Compromising on something that doesn't matter isn't "caving in". There's no principle at stake here.

    (Did I use the word "principle"? Usually a "principle" is something that you adhere strongly to without knowing why you adhere to it. I have no principles.)
    True enough, my final home is still out there, but this is most certainly my home range and I love it. I love every rock I fall off and tree I trip over. Even when I am close to dying from exhaustion, a beautiful sunset doesn't lose it's power to refresh and inspire me and that, in itself, is enough to save me sometimes.

  8. #8
    Junior Member Tokwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Penang and Kulim Malaysia
    Posts
    1,479

    Default

    Yep...I don't look at this as caving in either...as we all know...there are always alternatives....just like survival..we always dwell on alternatives...instead of using a match or a lighter, we used firesteel...instead of sleeping in a tent, some would use the hammock...instead of using machetes, some would use the saw or the axe..there is no right or wrong...it could be an improvement and to show that Mounties are no more encouraging the killing of wildlife for pelts or fur...this kinda helps with the wildlife preservation...I see nno wrong here but more towards..more right...as wool based hats/caps should be more warmer and comfy....
    I'm a Gramp who is not computer savvy, give me a slab and the rock ages tablet..I will do fine!

  9. #9
    Senior Member randyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    tip of the mitt
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    The muskrat over population cycle of a marsh is a sight to behold, it's called a eat off.. Wild life management is important. This is why I use the term caving in, the mounties know this.
    so the definition of a criminal is someone who breaks the law and you want me to believe that somehow more laws make less criminals?

  10. #10
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,828

    Default

    Randy, that statement implies that the RCMP switching to another fur will cause an over population of muskrats. That may or may not be true, I have no way of knowing. It would be interesting to know what percentage of global muskrat furs the RCMP need makes up. According to this article, the RCMP purchase 3000 new hats each year and another 1000 for the Honor Guard. That would be between 8000 and 12000 pelts if the article is accurate. That seems like a lot of pelts to me but I don't know how many are used world wide.

    http://furbearerdefenders.com/what-w...is-the-problem

    Apparently China "can't get enough of them".

    http://www.mlive.com/outdoors/index....s_price_f.html

  11. #11
    Senior Member MrFixIt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Bogart, GA
    Posts
    1,093

    Default

    I guess coonskin hats are next...
    When all else fails, read the directions, and beware the Chihuahuacabra!

  12. #12
    Senior Member randyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    tip of the mitt
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    It won't cause a over population. There are many fur harvesters, many muskrats and a demand for pelts.
    so the definition of a criminal is someone who breaks the law and you want me to believe that somehow more laws make less criminals?

  13. #13
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,828

    Default

    Governments (at least yours and mine) tend to bend with the wind. Neither are particularly noted for doing the right thing. And neither are particularly noted for knowing what to do when it comes to wildlife. They seldom get it right. My guess is the trappers associations weren't lobbying as hard as the anti-trapping crowd. That might be a lesson learned. It might be a good time to contact whichever association you belong to and your local Territorial Minister and Provincial Representative and ask them what the heck they are doing.

    You might also ask them where the Merino wool is coming from and where the hats are made.

  14. #14
    Senior Member WolfVanZandt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    I have a serious problem with game management as it is. For instance, Alabama has a problem with deer. It's difficult to drive with all the deer. Why is there a deer population problem. Well, hunters wiped out the deer population early on and then game managers decided it would be good for hunting if they repopulated the state with deer. Only, in the meantime, they wiped out the natural predator (which humans are not), wolves. Natural predators control prey populations. Hunters do not control prey populations. Alabama also has the same problem with feral hogs (although that was the bright idea of Alabama hunters, not game managers). Alabama is also developing the same problem with Western Cougars; that can be placed on the account of both Alabama hunters and Alabama farmers who thought it would be a good idea to get rid of the fairly untroublesome Florida panthers.

    Science has learned that chaos throws a monkeywrench into scientific endeavors by introducing the Unexpected Consequence. Game managers, hunters, and farmers haven't caught wind of this while pursuing their "scientific progress", and they don't really care as long as they think they're improving their short term bottom line and as long as politicians (which game managers tend to be) are busy keeping their constituents happy.

    I'm not particularly sympathetic toward the muskrats (I would happily eat one if I were hungry without feeling the least guilt about removing their furry little life from them), nor am I particularly sympathetic toward the hat makers, the game managers, the hunters, or the farmers as long as they manage their bottom lines to the exclusion of the rest of the world. What I would like to see is people working together to make the world work. I don't see a lot of that happening. "We" (as a collective people - meaning the knowledge is there) know what works. Politics and self-centeredness just keeps getting in the way.
    True enough, my final home is still out there, but this is most certainly my home range and I love it. I love every rock I fall off and tree I trip over. Even when I am close to dying from exhaustion, a beautiful sunset doesn't lose it's power to refresh and inspire me and that, in itself, is enough to save me sometimes.

  15. #15

    Default

    Looks like the Canadian government may overturn the mounties' decision
    http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/ottawa-...ques-1.2032174

    Everything in life is a trade off. Like the article says, wear synthetic, you drill for oil. Wear wool and you contribute to global warming via farming and perhaps tenuously through the flatulence of sheep. If you farm cows for food and leather, why not other animals for dog food and fur pelts. What if they wore rabbit hats instead of muskrat? Would it make a difference because the rabbits are eaten?
    If we are to have another contest in…our national existence I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's, but between patriotism & intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition & ignorance on the other…
    ~ President Ulysses S. Grant

  16. #16
    Senior Member randyt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    tip of the mitt
    Posts
    5,258

    Default

    You beat me to it LOL, I was getting ready to post the update. For what it's worth muskrats are tastier than rabbits in my opinion.
    so the definition of a criminal is someone who breaks the law and you want me to believe that somehow more laws make less criminals?

  17. #17
    Senior Member WolfVanZandt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    Hmmm....I need to try one. Rabbits are pretty tasty.
    True enough, my final home is still out there, but this is most certainly my home range and I love it. I love every rock I fall off and tree I trip over. Even when I am close to dying from exhaustion, a beautiful sunset doesn't lose it's power to refresh and inspire me and that, in itself, is enough to save me sometimes.

  18. #18
    Junior Member Tokwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Penang and Kulim Malaysia
    Posts
    1,479

    Default

    Porcupines taste better between a rabbit and chicken
    I'm a Gramp who is not computer savvy, give me a slab and the rock ages tablet..I will do fine!

  19. #19
    Administrator Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Central Indiana
    Posts
    58,828

    Default

    That's a great article. She sure pulls no punches on how she feels about "radical animal activists". Bravo for her.

  20. #20
    Senior Member WolfVanZandt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    "Porcupines taste better between a rabbit and chicken "

    And you have toothpicks!
    True enough, my final home is still out there, but this is most certainly my home range and I love it. I love every rock I fall off and tree I trip over. Even when I am close to dying from exhaustion, a beautiful sunset doesn't lose it's power to refresh and inspire me and that, in itself, is enough to save me sometimes.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •