I find some of the members most welcoming, but the others? I'd diagnose them as having Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I'm also wondering if said individuals know how to read? Much of information I stated regarding myself is in the comments if only they read them before asking the same questions over and over. Assumptions made about the "leadership" designation is really off the mark and indicates a brain closed regarding other options available; such as I've already have a group formed and the "leadership" position was voted upon. A smart leader delegates, a smart leader listens to others who have the information that a leader may not have, a smart leader does his or her best gives disabled members of our group tasks they can complete, expertise others might not have.
Regarding the tree against the enemy. I'll swing it at them because of my IQ... Obviously I'm not serious (trying to be a social member and razz my azz right back attcha). Reread the comments as I'm getting "impatient" when the same questions are asked over and over again I've already answered. Instead of rereading, these specific individuals seem to be working for the next comedy spot to outdo the other or thinking of a "witty" reply instead of reading. Many who attack I must wonder their motivation. With my criminal profiling research (and of course I'm not referring certain individuals are of the criminal variety) which requires much forensic, criminal, and abnormal psychology, much of what one does or says starts with motivations. Be it far from me to opine the following, but some may have jealousy issues and must knock down anyone who doesn't take the position of a door mat. IMHO (NOT), there are questions answered in the profile as well as the introduction of oneself category. So I take it I'm supposed to lie? I tell it like it is, and if someone has a problem with my answers or don't bother to read them are the ones who may become a tyrant. The voting thingy I do believe is what Americans do when looking for someone to represent them in our democratic republic. The "collective" attitude reminds me of the now defunct Soviet Union. When someone has self-esteem and who is knowledgeable in many areas (SORRY, NO APOLOGY HERE! I LOVE IRONY!) must be knocked down a peg or to to ensure they don't rise above them. Now, if one has a problem with that, I guess I've made my point, eh? I do believe most of the members of the group are great, informative individuals, but the others seem to find this as their personal playground, emulating trolls under the bridge (DON'T LIKE TROLLS. THEY ARE LITTLE AND UGLY), a place to piddle around being obnoxious and have nothing to offer as far as I'm concerned. I DID mention not throwing out the baby with the bathwater. You must not have read that, too. Ho-Hum... Trees can be utilized as shelters or as adequate clubs to drag back to their cave after they've killed another Neanderthal... Now, if my comments here is what some call "socializing," I won't waste my valuable time... and it is valuable. I work 12 hours a day, 6 days a week and must use free time to delegate to all our members what items they thinks should be included. I think that is called "COOPERATION." The recreational reading comment was a non sequitur. My reading had nothing to do with survivalist information. I mentioned it in the intro or profile as my profession which requires research from books. Drag your clubs back to the cave and get some rest... you'll need it when I'm ready to do more "RAZZING." Gee! I'm beginning to like this!
Bookmarks