Search:

Sorry, but those are two completely separate and unrelated issues involving widely divergent mechanisms of injury. The one does not logically lead to the conclusion of the other.


And please...

If there was no head, how could there be an "exit wound, " or for that matter an enterance wound? There would just be a stump at the neck.

In this part you are probably correct. Nonetheless, it still is a needlessly suffering animal which provides no benefit to the hunter.


This is patently false. There is no hunting firearm...

I not so sure about that. I've often been a bit disappointed at the marksmanship I've seen from the typical soldier.

I do not recommend head/neck shots on big game, except for those who are highly experienced as well as supremely familiar and well-practiced with their rifle. Even then, taking such a shot is risky...